Accountability and decentralized service delivery
Read Online
Share

Accountability and decentralized service delivery explaining performance variation across local governments in Indonesia by Sebastian Eckardt

  • 301 Want to read
  • ·
  • 9 Currently reading

Published by Nomos in Baden-Baden .
Written in English

Subjects:

  • Local government -- Indonesia,
  • Decentralization in government -- Indonesia,
  • Municipal services -- Indonesia,
  • Indonesia -- Politics and government -- 21st century

Book details:

Edition Notes

StatementSebastian Eckardt.
Classifications
LC ClassificationsJS7193.A3 E35 2008
The Physical Object
Pagination238 p. :
Number of Pages238
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL23875826M
ISBN 109783832937874
LC Control Number2009455418

Download Accountability and decentralized service delivery

PDF EPUB FB2 MOBI RTF

Decentralized Governance and Accountability Academic Research and the Future of Donor Programming. Get access. Crossref Citations. This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef. Tran, Long International NGO Centralization and Leader-Perceived Effectiveness. Nonprofit. service delivery is an implicit motivation behind most of these decentralization efforts. The reasons are twofold. First, these basic services, such as health, education. Decentralization is another approach for improving service delivery. It is seen to enhance allocative and productive efficiency in the delivery of public services through the transfer of functions, powers, and responsibilities to lower-level institutions or local authorities. fiscal decentralization, human resource decentralization, ensuring inclusivity and accountability in local governance, and ensuring efficiency and responsiveness in service delivery. Although the current National Decentralization Policy (, p. ) recognizes the importanceFile Size: 1MB.

Decentralization of provision of public services has been an important item in the. agenda of developing countries. While some scholars and practitioners argue that. decentralization is associated with improvements in provision due to higher. accountability, others potential pitfalls. advocate decentralization as a means of strengthening accountability and thereby improving service delivery. Devolving responsibility for public services to lower tiers of government means that the politician who is responsible is now a locally-elected one (Figure 2). The hope is that this would make him more accountable to the citizens, as. Ensuring Accountability in Privatized and Decentralized Delivery of Public Services: The Role of the Asian Ombudsman (Conference Paper).   How Service Delivery is or can be managed in decentralized system/LGs in Uganda SD in decentralized systems of governance are managed based on the decentralization powers of LGs which gives everyone mandate to take part in the budgeting/ planning, allocations, implementation and monitoring of the resources to ensure effective service delivery.

Rajesh Kumar Pundhir, Abebe Boke-Assessment of Decentralized Local Governance Performance for Service Delivery in Ethiopia: The Case Study of Angacha District (Woreda) EUROPEAN ACADEMIC RESEARCH - Vol. III, Issue 3 / June governance, bureaucratic transparency, and empowerment of citizens at local levels (MCB, ).File Size: KB. Likewise, and perhaps more significantly, the incentives facing local and national politicians can have a profound effect on the provision of local services. Finally, the process of implementing decentralization can be as important as the design of the system in influencing service delivery outcomes. Participation, decentralization and human rights: a review of approaches for strengthening voice and accountability in local governance (English) Abstract. This report examines the theoretical and practical synergies between three intervention models that are currently being employed to improve local governance in developing countries: 1 Cited by: 1. Local Government Ordinance (LGO ) represented an attempt to address recognised accountability failures through local government reforms. It sought to redesign political, electoral and administrative structures at local level in order to increase the accountability of service .